Talk:List of military special forces units
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of military special forces units article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article was nominated for deletion on September 21, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Better way to reorganize this list visually?
[edit]For those who help maintain this article frequently (as well as any other viewers who may see this), I was thinking we could probably improve the readability of the article by converting the list entries into a standardized table format. Here's an example I'd suggest:
Nation | Service Branch | Parent Command | Unit | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lebanon | Lebanese Army Ground Forces | Lebanese Armed Forces Special Operations Command | Lebanese Commando Regiment (aka "Ranger Regiment")[1][2] | |
Mexico | Mexican Army | Special Forces Corps[3] | Special Reaction Force | |
Mexican Navy[4] | Amphibious Special Forces Group |
refs
|
---|
References
|
Thoughts? ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 03:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC) ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 03:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- While I agree that tables can have benefits over lists in some contexts, I'm not sure this is one of them. On this page, it is basically a necessity to attach specific refs to specific units, as opposed to grouping them all in a single "refs" column cell, and on a table, that can look cluttered and messy. Also not sure that the generic column headings will work for every country, as some countries will require more sub-headings/additinal cells of their own. There will also very likely be a need for a good deal of grouped/merged cells in many of the countries as well. All this again takes away from a clean table look.
Additionally, this will all lead to a page with a good deal of wikitext, which is too complex for many of the single-use/low-use fly in/fly out ip-users that edit this page regularly, and will either lead to messes left behind in need of fixing, or excluding a large number of potential editors from contributing, (which I believe we're all supposed to be avoiding right now). Anyway, that's just my two cents on this, sorry about the length. - \\'cLf 08:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)